San Filipo Vs. Dist. Ct. (Bischel)

Nevada Supreme Court

San Filipo Vs. Dist. Ct. (Bischel)

DecidedMarch 9, 2021

Docket82125

StatusPublished

This text of San Filipo Vs. Dist. Ct. (Bischel) (San Filipo Vs. Dist. Ct. (Bischel)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

San Filipo Vs. Dist. Ct. (Bischel), (Neb. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

PAUL A. SAN FILIPO, No. 82125 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MAR 0 9 2021 CHRISTY CRAIG, DISTRICT JUDGE, ELIZABECI A. BROMI74 Respondents, CLERK S REM6i COURT and BY DEPUTY-FLER=- PATRICK BISCHEL, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a contract action. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Walker u. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev., Adv. Op. 80, 476 P.3d 1194, 1196 (2020) (setting forth the requisites for issuance of mandamus relief); see also Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

arraguirre

j. , J. Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT OF

-0 an NEVADA

10) I947A 441100 cc: Hon. Christy Craig, District Judge Olson, Cannon, Gormley, & Stoberski Law Office of Timothy P. Thomas, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SVPREME COvFIT OF NEVADA 2 ((), I )47A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

PAUL A. SAN FILIPO, No. 82125 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MAR 0 9 2021 CHRISTY CRAIG, DISTRICT JUDGE, ELIZABECI A. BROMI74 Respondents, CLERK S REM6i COURT and BY DEPUTY-FLER=- PATRICK BISCHEL, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a contract action. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Walker u. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev., Adv. Op. 80, 476 P.3d 1194, 1196 (2020) (setting forth the requisites for issuance of mandamus relief); see also Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

arraguirre

j. , J. Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT OF

-0 an NEVADA

10) I947A 441100 cc: Hon. Christy Craig, District Judge Olson, Cannon, Gormley, & Stoberski Law Office of Timothy P. Thomas, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SVPREME COvFIT OF NEVADA 2 ((), I )47A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

San Filipo Vs. Dist. Ct. (Bischel), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-filipo-vs-dist-ct-bischel-nev-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack