San Felipe Mining Co. v. Belshaw

California Supreme Court

San Felipe Mining Co. v. Belshaw

49 Cal. 655

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1875

DocketNo. 4,480

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 49 Cal. 655 (San Felipe Mining Co. v. Belshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

San Felipe Mining Co. v. Belshaw, 49 Cal. 655 (Cal. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

Irrespective of other points made by the appellant, and which need not now be considered, we are of opinion that the Court below erred in instructing the jury that the agreement of August 4th, 1870, was sufficient in point of law to divest the interest of De la Mere and vest the same in the plaintiff, so as to enable the plaintiff to recover that interest in this action.

Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed and cause remanded. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

Irrespective of other points made by the appellant, and which need not now be considered, we are of opinion that the Court below erred in instructing the jury that the agreement of August 4th, 1870, was sufficient in point of law to divest the interest of De la Mere and vest the same in the plaintiff, so as to enable the plaintiff to recover that interest in this action.

Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed and cause remanded. Remittitur forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Cal. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-felipe-mining-co-v-belshaw-cal-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack