San Bernardino v. Indus. Acc. Com.

California Court of Appeal

San Bernardino v. Indus. Acc. Com.

227 P. 924, 67 Cal. App. 590, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 429

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 4, 1924

DocketCiv. No. 4754.

StatusPublished

This text of 227 P. 924 (San Bernardino v. Indus. Acc. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

San Bernardino v. Indus. Acc. Com., 227 P. 924, 67 Cal. App. 590, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 429 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

[1] In its application for the writ of certiorari petitioner has made no attempt to comply with that rule of the supreme court which provides that the application must fairly state "all material evidence" relating to the point as to which the want of evidence is claimed to exist. (Rule XXVI, subd. 4.) Nor has petitioner seen fit to file any reply to the Commission's answer, though the time therefor has elapsed, and the answer purports to supply much of the evidence which was omitted by petitioner in its application. We therefore feel justified in assuming that all of the material evidence bearing upon the point raised by petitioner is set forth in the Commission's answer. The evidence so set forth in the answer unquestionably is sufficient to warrant the conclusion of the Commission, and the writ, therefore, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1] In its application for the writ of certiorari petitioner has made no attempt to comply with that rule of the supreme court which provides that the application must fairly state "all material evidence" relating to the point as to which the want of evidence is claimed to exist. (Rule XXVI, subd. 4.) Nor has petitioner seen fit to file any reply to the Commission's answer, though the time therefor has elapsed, and the answer purports to supply much of the evidence which was omitted by petitioner in its application. We therefore feel justified in assuming that all of the material evidence bearing upon the point raised by petitioner is set forth in the Commission's answer. The evidence so set forth in the answer unquestionably is sufficient to warrant the conclusion of the Commission, and the writ, therefore, is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 P. 924, 67 Cal. App. 590, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-bernardino-v-indus-acc-com-calctapp-1924.