San Angelo v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

San Angelo v. Maryland Casualty Co.

179 So. 2d 681, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3818

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 28, 1965

DocketNo. 10487

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 So. 2d 681 (San Angelo v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

San Angelo v. Maryland Casualty Co., 179 So. 2d 681, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3818 (La. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

GLADNEY, Judge.

This is a consolidated case arising from an automobile accident litigated in Jones v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., 179 So.2d 678, this day decided. This suit, brought by Tony San Angelo as attorney in fact for Charles Maggio, is for the recovery of property damage to a tractor which Maggio had leased to San Angelo for use in farming operations. Jones, plaintiff in the aboye styled case, was driving the tractor as an employee of San Angelo at the time of the accident.

Recovery may be only sanctioned herein if actionable negligence by the defendant’s insured, Ford E. Stinson, is proven. Therefore, since Stinson has been held to be free from actionable negligence in the Jones suit, there can be no recovery by plaintiff herein.

The judgment is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GLADNEY, Judge.

This is a consolidated case arising from an automobile accident litigated in Jones v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., 179 So.2d 678, this day decided. This suit, brought by Tony San Angelo as attorney in fact for Charles Maggio, is for the recovery of property damage to a tractor which Maggio had leased to San Angelo for use in farming operations. Jones, plaintiff in the aboye styled case, was driving the tractor as an employee of San Angelo at the time of the accident.

Recovery may be only sanctioned herein if actionable negligence by the defendant’s insured, Ford E. Stinson, is proven. Therefore, since Stinson has been held to be free from actionable negligence in the Jones suit, there can be no recovery by plaintiff herein.

The judgment is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 So. 2d 681, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-angelo-v-maryland-casualty-co-lactapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack