San A Jong v. Lesesne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

San A Jong v. Lesesne

114 A.D.3d 624, 980 N.Y.S.2d 771

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 114 A.D.3d 624 (San A Jong v. Lesesne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

San A Jong v. Lesesne, 114 A.D.3d 624, 980 N.Y.S.2d 771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered April 23, 2013, which denied defendants’ motion to change venue from Bronx County to New York County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[625]*625The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to change venue as untimely. The record shows that defendants had the facts necessary to seek a change of venue several years in advance of the time their motion was made and that they did not provide a reasonable explanation for their delay in seeking the venue change (see e.g. Romero v St. Anthony Community Hosp., 96 AD3d 532 [1st Dept 2012]; Mena v Four Wheels Co., 272 AD2d 223 [1st Dept 2000]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, Renwick, Freedman and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered April 23, 2013, which denied defendants’ motion to change venue from Bronx County to New York County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[625]*625The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to change venue as untimely. The record shows that defendants had the facts necessary to seek a change of venue several years in advance of the time their motion was made and that they did not provide a reasonable explanation for their delay in seeking the venue change (see e.g. Romero v St. Anthony Community Hosp., 96 AD3d 532 [1st Dept 2012]; Mena v Four Wheels Co., 272 AD2d 223 [1st Dept 2000]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, Renwick, Freedman and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.3d 624, 980 N.Y.S.2d 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-a-jong-v-lesesne-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack