Samuels v. Kurland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Samuels v. Kurland

5 A.D.2d 686, 169 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 686 (Samuels v. Kurland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samuels v. Kurland, 5 A.D.2d 686, 169 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the purchaser to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the appeal is from so much of an order as grants summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and from the judgment entered thereon. The contract provides that it may not be modified or changed orally and that time is of the essence as to the performance of each and every term. Appellant contends that the time of payment was extended by oral agreement between him and the respondents’ attorney. Order, insofar as appeal is taken, and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present—Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the purchaser to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the appeal is from so much of an order as grants summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and from the judgment entered thereon. The contract provides that it may not be modified or changed orally and that time is of the essence as to the performance of each and every term. Appellant contends that the time of payment was extended by oral agreement between him and the respondents’ attorney. Order, insofar as appeal is taken, and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present—Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 686, 169 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuels-v-kurland-nyappdiv-1957.