Samuels v. Fairfield Condominium Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Samuels v. Fairfield Condominium Ass'n

453 S.W.3d 380, 2015 WL 342698

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 2015·No. No. ED 100999·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Phillip and Kathy Samuels (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment finding that Defendant Fairfield Condominium Association, Inc. (“Fairfield”) was not responsible for the maintenance or repairs to Plaintiffs’ outdoor wall, sidewalk, or interior damage. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Phillip and Kathy Samuels (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment finding that Defendant Fairfield Condominium Association, Inc. (“Fairfield”) was not responsible for the maintenance or repairs to Plaintiffs’ outdoor wall, sidewalk, or interior damage. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Samuels v. Fairfield Condominium Ass'n, 453 S.W.3d 380, 2015 WL 342698 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

453 S.W.3d 380 (Samuels v. Fairfield Condominium Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.