Samuel Zean v. SelectQuote Insurance Services

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1263

___________________________

Samuel Zean

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

eFinancial, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

SelectQuote Insurance Services, a Kansas Corporation

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Burialexpense.com

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

InsideResponse, LLC, a Kansas Limited Liability Company; Tiburon Insurance Services, a California Company

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Allied Insurance Partners, a Florida Corporation, also known as Alliedco/Allied Insurance Services

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________

Submitted: May 31, 2022

Filed: June 3, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota resident Samuel Zean appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action raising claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. See Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.