Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2019·No. 18-1252·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-1252

SAMUEL YAMIL MENDEZ-CARMONA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

May 2, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Welker, 536 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 1988) (“[T]he giving of consent is a verbal act, and therefore testimony that someone has given consent is not hearsay.” (quoting Welker v. State, 504 So. 2d 802, 806 n.3 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987))).

WETHERELL, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of Florida (Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Welker v. State
504 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Welker
536 So. 2d 1017 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)