Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 2019
Docket18-1252
StatusPublished

This text of Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of Florida (Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-1252 _____________________________

SAMUEL YAMIL MENDEZ-CARMONA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

May 2, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Welker, 536 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 1988) (“[T]he giving of consent is a verbal act, and therefore testimony that someone has given consent is not hearsay.” (quoting Welker v. State, 504 So. 2d 802, 806 n.3 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987))).

WETHERELL, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welker v. State
504 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Welker
536 So. 2d 1017 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-yamil-mendez-carmona-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.