Samuel Wright v. Soledad Mendoza-Hernandez
This text of Samuel Wright v. Soledad Mendoza-Hernandez (Samuel Wright v. Soledad Mendoza-Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ August 24, 2017
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A18A0202. SAMUEL WRIGHT v. SOLEDAD MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ.
This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling in that court, defendant Samuel Wright appealed to the superior court. The superior court also ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and Wright filed this direct appeal from the superior court’s order. We lack jurisdiction. Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Wright was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Wright’s failure to follow that procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/24/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Samuel Wright v. Soledad Mendoza-Hernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-wright-v-soledad-mendoza-hernandez-gactapp-2017.