Samuel Wayne Guy v. Scott Gassman, Lee Slominsky
This text of 920 F.2d 926 (Samuel Wayne Guy v. Scott Gassman, Lee Slominsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
920 F.2d 926
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Samuel Wayne GUY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Scott GASSMAN, Lee Slominsky, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6164.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 3, 1990.
Decided Dec. 17, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-90-449-CRT)
Samuel Wayne Guy, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Wayne Guy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Guy v. Gassman, CA-90-449-CRT (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
920 F.2d 926, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25810, 1990 WL 203833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-wayne-guy-v-scott-gassman-lee-slominsky-ca4-1990.