Samuel W. Odom v. The S. S. Monarch of the Seas, Her Boilers, Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Furniture, and Waterman Steamship Corporation

322 F.2d 1022
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 15, 1963·No. 20106·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Since the entry of the judgment of the district court from which this appeal was taken, this Court decided the case of Flowers v. Savannah Machine & Foundry Co., 5th Cir., 1962, 310 F.2d 135. The factual situation here presented is not materially different from that which was present in Flowers. We adhere to the decision there made with the result that the judgment of the district court must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel W. Odom v. The S. S. Monarch of the Seas, Her Boilers, Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Furniture, and Waterman Steamship Corporation, 322 F.2d 1022 (5th Cir. 1963).

322 F.2d 1022 (Samuel W. Odom v. The S. S. Monarch of the Seas, Her Boilers, Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Furniture, and Waterman Steamship Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daws v. Movible Offshore, Inc.
264 F. Supp. 764 (E.D. Louisiana, 1967)