Samuel W. Clark v. Alan W. Payne, as Members of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia, Harry Friedman
This text of 257 F.2d 655 (Samuel W. Clark v. Alan W. Payne, as Members of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia, Harry Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
257 F.2d 655
103 U.S.App.D.C. 277
Samuel W. CLARK, Appellant,
v.
Alan W. PAYNE, et al., as Members of the Alcoholic Beverage
Control Board for the District of Columbia, Harry
Friedman, Appellees.
No. 14286.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 28, 1958.
Decided June 12, 1958, Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied
Sept. 9, 1958.
Mr. Samuel W. Clark, appellant pro se.
Mr. Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and William W. Pavis, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellees Payne, and others as members of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia.
Mr. Morris D. Schwartz, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Philip P. Marenberg and Martin S. Becker, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee Friedman.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, FAHY and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Assuming without deciding that appellant has standing to sue,1 we find no error in the action of the District Court.
Affirmed.
Appellant requested this court to pass on both his standing to sue and on the merits
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 F.2d 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-w-clark-v-alan-w-payne-as-members-of-the-alcoholic-beverage-cadc-1958.