Samuel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Samuel v. State

302 S.W.3d 823, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 146, 2010 WL 537082

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 2010·No. No. WD 70736·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri (“motion court”). In his single point relied on, Ap[824] pellant Charles E. Samuel (“Samuel”) claims that the motion court clearly erred in not granting his motion because Samuel’s two consecutive life sentences constitute cruel and unusual punishment in that they are grossly disproportionate to those of his more culpable co-defendants. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri (“motion court”). In his single point relied on, Ap[824] pellant Charles E. Samuel (“Samuel”) claims that the motion court clearly erred in not granting his motion because Samuel’s two consecutive life sentences constitute cruel and unusual punishment in that they are grossly disproportionate to those of his more culpable co-defendants. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Samuel v. State, 302 S.W.3d 823, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 146, 2010 WL 537082 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

302 S.W.3d 823 (Samuel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.