Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Samuel v. State

Samuel v. State

133 So. 3d 608, 2014 WL 860610, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2970
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 2014
DocketNo. 1D14-0205
StatusPublished

This text of 133 So. 3d 608 (Samuel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel v. State, 133 So. 3d 608, 2014 WL 860610, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2970 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is dismissed without prejudice to petitioner securing the rendition of an appealable, written order, via petition for writ of mandamus if necessary, and filing a timely notice of appeal directed to that order. See, e.g., State v. Sullivan, 640 So.2d 77, 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (“[i]f a trial court fails or refuses to enter a written order that is needed for an appeal, counsel has the remedy of filing a motion or a petition for writ of mandamus with this court to compel the trial court to enter such an order” (citing State v. Bolick, 512 So.2d 960 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987))).

CLARK, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sullivan
640 So. 2d 77 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
State v. Bolick
512 So. 2d 960 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 So. 3d 608, 2014 WL 860610, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.