Samuel v. Manrith Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Samuel v. Manrith Realty Corp.

243 A.D. 552

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 552 (Samuel v. Manrith Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samuel v. Manrith Realty Corp., 243 A.D. 552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by Regina Samuel to recover for personal injuries sustained as the result of a fall on a stairway in defendant’s apartment house and by Alexander Samuel to recover for expenses and loss of services. Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The refusal of the request to charge was not prejudicial error in view of the granting of defendant’s request to charge immediately thereafter and in view of the court’s main charge, both of which precluded a finding against the defendant unless the factual basis were other than that upon which the refused request to charge was predicated. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by Regina Samuel to recover for personal injuries sustained as the result of a fall on a stairway in defendant’s apartment house and by Alexander Samuel to recover for expenses and loss of services. Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The refusal of the request to charge was not prejudicial error in view of the granting of defendant’s request to charge immediately thereafter and in view of the court’s main charge, both of which precluded a finding against the defendant unless the factual basis were other than that upon which the refused request to charge was predicated. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-v-manrith-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1934.