Samuel v. Druckman & Sinel, LLP

912 N.E.2d 1060, 12 N.Y.3d 899, 884 N.Y.S.2d 681, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 2518

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Samuel v. Druckman & Sinel, LLP. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 N.Y.3d 205 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2009·Published

Opinion

*900 Motion to resettle, amend and clarify the opinion and remittitur or, in the alternative, for reargument denied [see 12 NY3d 205 (2009)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel v. Druckman & Sinel, LLP, 912 N.E.2d 1060, 12 N.Y.3d 899, 884 N.Y.S.2d 681, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 2518 (N.Y. 2009).

Pincite

912 N.E.2d 1060 (Samuel v. Druckman & Sinel, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

906 N.E.2d 1042 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)