Samuel v. Braun Elevator Consultants, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Samuel v. Braun Elevator Consultants, Inc.

204 A.D.2d 176, 612 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5345

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 A.D.2d 176 (Samuel v. Braun Elevator Consultants, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samuel v. Braun Elevator Consultants, Inc., 204 A.D.2d 176, 612 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.) entered April 8, 1993 which, to the extent appealed from, granted the motion of defendant E.G. Elevator Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The contract between defendant E.G. Elevator Company and the Veterans Administration, plaintiff’s employer, specifically provided that said defendant would inspect the elevators in the subject building and submit an itemized list of proposed repairs and the Veterans Administration would determine which repairs said defendant would make and which repairs it would undertake itself. Here, the Veterans Administration undertook responsibility itself with respect to the faulty electric eye which is alleged to have been the cause of plaintiff’s injuries (see, Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v Y.B.H. Realty Corp., 76 NY2d 220; Public Adm’r of County of N. Y. v Fifth Ave. Dev. Corp., 180 AD2d 473). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.) entered April 8, 1993 which, to the extent appealed from, granted the motion of defendant E.G. Elevator Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The contract between defendant E.G. Elevator Company and the Veterans Administration, plaintiff’s employer, specifically provided that said defendant would inspect the elevators in the subject building and submit an itemized list of proposed repairs and the Veterans Administration would determine which repairs said defendant would make and which repairs it would undertake itself. Here, the Veterans Administration undertook responsibility itself with respect to the faulty electric eye which is alleged to have been the cause of plaintiff’s injuries (see, Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v Y.B.H. Realty Corp., 76 NY2d 220; Public Adm’r of County of N. Y. v Fifth Ave. Dev. Corp., 180 AD2d 473). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 176, 612 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-v-braun-elevator-consultants-inc-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack