Samuel Stores v. Popular Outfitting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Samuel Stores v. Popular Outfitting Co.

174 A.D. 925, 159 N.Y.S. 1140

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 174 A.D. 925 (Samuel Stores v. Popular Outfitting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samuel Stores v. Popular Outfitting Co., 174 A.D. 925, 159 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified by striking out all the adjudging provisions thereof and by inserting in lieu thereof the following: “It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, its officers and agents, be and hereby are restrained and enjoined from using any lists of names taken from the books of the plaintiff, of copies of the same or memoranda made therefrom, and are hereby directed to return to plaintiff all lists of names taken from the books of plaintiff and all books and other memoranda or copies of same which belong to plaintiff and which are in control or possession of the defendant or any of its officers or agents,” and as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, together with the order, without costs to either party. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by striking out all the adjudging provisions thereof and by inserting in lieu thereof the following: “It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, its officers and agents, be and hereby are restrained and enjoined from using any lists of names taken from the books of the plaintiff, of copies of the same or memoranda made therefrom, and are hereby directed to return to plaintiff all lists of names taken from the books of plaintiff and all books and other memoranda or copies of same which belong to plaintiff and which are in control or possession of the defendant or any of its officers or agents,” and as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, together with the order, without costs to either party. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A.D. 925, 159 N.Y.S. 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-stores-v-popular-outfitting-co-nyappdiv-1916.