Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States

17 Cust. Ct. 300, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 848
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Cust. Ct. 41
United States Customs Court·Decided September 9, 1946·No. No. 6341; Entry Nos. 983; 1187; 1322·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export values, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States, 17 Cust. Ct. 300, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 848 (cusc 1946).

17 Cust. Ct. 300 (Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.