Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States

8 Cust. Ct. 574, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 624
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 2, 1942
DocketNo. 5540; Entry No. 1739, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 574 (Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States, 8 Cust. Ct. 574, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 624 (cusc 1942).

Opinion

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals to reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve the proper dutiable value of certain Christmas-tree ornaments exported from Germany and imported at the port of Baltimore, Md.

The cases have been submitted for decision on a stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties, wherein it is agreed, in substance, as follows:

(1) That the Christmas-tree ornaments in question were exported from Germany during the period from June, 1936, to September, 1938.

(2) That the instant merchandise is similar in all material respects to that which was the subject of the decision in the case of F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States (Reap. Dec. 5094).

(3) That the market conditions existing during the period of exportation of the articles in question were similar, if not identical, to the conditions found to be prevailing in the foreign market as described in the Woolworth Co. case, supra.

(4) That the extra charge of 2% per centum appearing on the Invoices herein is the usual 2}i per centum inside packing charge applying to this line of merchandise.

(5) That the record in the Woolworth Co. case, supra, may be incorporated in and made a part of the record in the present cases.

[575]*575On the agreed facts, as hereinabove set forth, I find that on the dates of exportation of the instant merchandise Christmas-tree ornaments, such as and similar to those involved herein, were freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country of exportation, to wit, the Sonneberg-Lauscha district of Germany, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for consumption in Germany and for exportation to the United States and other countries.

Accordingly, I hold as matter of law:

(1) That the proper dutiable foreign and export values of the Christmas-tree ornaments exported prior to January 1, 1938, are the per se unit invoice prices, plus 2% per centum inside packing, and

(2) That the proper dutiable foreign and export values of the Christmas-tree ornaments exported subsequent to January 1, 1938, are the per se unit invoice prices, plus 3per centum social assessments, plus 2 1/2 per centum inside packing, and

As to all the foregoing, plus, when not included in such per se unit invoice prices, all other costs of cases and packing and the cost of all other containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, as invoiced, whenever reported as dutiable by the appraiser.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Cust. Ct. 574, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-shapiro-co-v-united-states-cusc-1942.