Samuel Rubin & Son, Inc. v. Sackler

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Samuel Rubin & Son, Inc. v. Sackler

190 Misc. 1064, 76 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3572

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1947

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 190 Misc. 1064 (Samuel Rubin & Son, Inc. v. Sackler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samuel Rubin & Son, Inc. v. Sackler, 190 Misc. 1064, 76 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The appellant was a member of the immediate family of the tenant and upon her decease he did not become a squatter, any more than upon the death of the head of a family the rest of the family would be considered as squatters.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order awarded appellant dismissing the petition on the merits, with costs. Appeal by landlord dismissed.

Hammeb, Hofstadteb and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, eta.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI