Samuel Rosenkoff v. Victor F. Mariani
This text of 226 F.2d 54 (Samuel Rosenkoff v. Victor F. Mariani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
226 F.2d 54
96 U.S.App.D.C. 332
Samuel ROSENKOFF, Appellant,
v.
Victor F. MARIANI, Appellee.
No. 12591.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued June 7, 1955.
Decided July 21, 1955.
Mr. Mark P. Friedlander, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. James M. Earnest, with whom Mr. Philip Goldstein, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for breach of contract. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 F.2d 54, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 332, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-rosenkoff-v-victor-f-mariani-cadc-1955.