Samuel Riddle v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

823 F.2d 164, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10238
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1987·No. 86-5228·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court, 817 F.2d 1238, is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Riddle v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 823 F.2d 164, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10238 (6th Cir. 1987).

823 F.2d 164 (Samuel Riddle v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

KFC Corporation v. Kamal
W.D. Kentucky, 2020
London v. Halter
203 F. Supp. 2d 367 (E.D. Tennessee, 2001)
United States v. One 1985 Chevrolet Corvette
914 F.2d 804 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
Salmi v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
712 F. Supp. 566 (W.D. Michigan, 1989)
Flemm v. Bowen
698 F. Supp. 709 (N.D. Ohio, 1988)
Spruil v. Bowen
691 F. Supp. 302 (M.D. Florida, 1988)
Pierce v. Underwood
487 U.S. 552 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Edwards v. McMahon
834 F.2d 796 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Martin v. Bowen
670 F. Supp. 295 (E.D. California, 1987)