Samuel R. Lefortappellant v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company

358 F.2d 741
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 1966
Docket22438
StatusPublished

This text of 358 F.2d 741 (Samuel R. Lefortappellant v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel R. Lefortappellant v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, 358 F.2d 741 (5th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant sued the malpractice insurer of his attending surgeon and the malpractice and the general liability insurers of the hospital in which his hernia operation was performed for damages on account of a staphylococcus aureus infection in his surgical incision beginning three or four days after his operation. He based his theories of malpractice and negligence on the allegation that the shortcomings in the conduct of his physician and the hospital improperly permitted him to be exposed to the bacteria causing the infection.

The only question presented here is whether the trial court erred in instructing a verdict for the appellees. No purpose would be served in setting out the details of the evidence. We have carefully examined the record and conclude that the failure of the appellant to sustain his burden of establishing a causal connection between the claimed deviation from the accepted professional standards and his infection justified the court in not submitting the case to the jury.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 F.2d 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-r-lefortappellant-v-massachusetts-bonding-and-insurance-company-ca5-1966.