Samuel R. Builta A/K/A Sam Builta, Individually and D/B/A Technical Services System v. Paragon, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Samuel R. Builta A/K/A Sam Builta, Individually and D/B/A Technical Services System v. Paragon, Inc.

DecidedMarch 22, 2018

Docket04-17-00716-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Samuel R. Builta A/K/A Sam Builta, Individually and D/B/A Technical Services System v. Paragon, Inc. (Samuel R. Builta A/K/A Sam Builta, Individually and D/B/A Technical Services System v. Paragon, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samuel R. Builta A/K/A Sam Builta, Individually and D/B/A Technical Services System v. Paragon, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 22, 2018

No. 04-17-00716-CV

Samuel R. BUILTA a/k/a Sam Builta, Individually and d/b/a Technical Services System, Appellants

v.

PARAGON, INC., Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 393227 Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

ORDER On February 14, 2018, after the court reporter advised this court that Appellant had not yet paid for the record, but that Appellant indicated he would do so, we ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court by February 26, 2018, that (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. We advised Appellant that if he failed to respond within the time provided, he must file a brief with this court by March 16, 2018, and the court would only “consider and decide those issues or points [raised in Appellant’s brief] that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.” See id. R. 37.3(c). To date, Appellant has not filed written proof that the reporter’s record has been paid, a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or the brief. We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Appellant’s written response must include a reasonable explanation for Appellant’s failure to timely file the brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). If Appellant fails to show cause as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed without further notice. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Elizondo, 975 S.W.2d at 63. _________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of March, 2018.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 22, 2018

No. 04-17-00716-CV

Samuel R. BUILTA a/k/a Sam Builta, Individually and d/b/a Technical Services System, Appellants

v.

PARAGON, INC., Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 393227 Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

ORDER On February 14, 2018, after the court reporter advised this court that Appellant had not yet paid for the record, but that Appellant indicated he would do so, we ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court by February 26, 2018, that (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. We advised Appellant that if he failed to respond within the time provided, he must file a brief with this court by March 16, 2018, and the court would only “consider and decide those issues or points [raised in Appellant’s brief] that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.” See id. R. 37.3(c). To date, Appellant has not filed written proof that the reporter’s record has been paid, a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or the brief. We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Appellant’s written response must include a reasonable explanation for Appellant’s failure to timely file the brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). If Appellant fails to show cause as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed without further notice. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Elizondo, 975 S.W.2d at 63. _________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of March, 2018.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Samuel R. Builta A/K/A Sam Builta, Individually and D/B/A Technical Services System v. Paragon, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-r-builta-aka-sam-builta-individually-and-dba-technical-texapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack