Samuel Ojeda-Hernandez v. William P. Barr
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 18-3331
Samuel Ojeda-Hernandez
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted: December 2, 2019 Filed: December 11, 2019 [Unpublished]
Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Samuel Ojeda-Hernandez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his interlocutory appeal from the decision of an immigration judge denying his motion to terminate removal proceedings. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments, this court grants respondent’s
motion to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C.§ 1252(a)(1); Camick v. Sessions, 891 F.3d 1101, 1106 (8th Cir. 2018).
Respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted. The petition for review is dismissed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Samuel Ojeda-Hernandez v. William P. Barr (Samuel Ojeda-Hernandez v. William P. Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.