Samuel Michaels v. Nancy Berryhill
This text of 697 F. App'x 223 (Samuel Michaels v. Nancy Berryhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are' not binding precedent in this circuit..
Samuel Litvin Michaels appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, .the joint appendix, and the administrative record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Michaels v. Berryhill, No. 3:15-cv-00388-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 26, 2016 and entered Sept. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
697 F. App'x 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-michaels-v-nancy-berryhill-ca4-2017.