Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/SAMUEL MEDRANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

SAMUEL MEDRANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 24, 2020·No. 19-3231·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

SAMUEL MEDRANO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3231

[September 24, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael C. Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 472013CF000323A.

Rachael E. Reese of O'Brien Hatfield Reese, PA, Tampa, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMUEL MEDRANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

SAMUEL MEDRANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (SAMUEL MEDRANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.