SAMUEL MEDRANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of SAMUEL MEDRANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (SAMUEL MEDRANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
SAMUEL MEDRANO, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-3231
[September 24, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael C. Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 472013CF000323A.
Rachael E. Reese of O'Brien Hatfield Reese, PA, Tampa, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SAMUEL MEDRANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-medrano-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.