Samuel Leal v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 21, 2018
Docket13-18-00017-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Samuel Leal v. State (Samuel Leal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel Leal v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NUMBERS 13-18-00012-CR, 13-18-00017-CR, AND 13-18-00018-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

SAMUEL LEAL, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellees.

On appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court because the court reporter, Esther Natividad, has

failed to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record in these causes was originally

due to be filed on January 16, 2018. On February 26, 2018, the Clerk of this Court

notified the reporter that the record in cause numbers 13-18-00012-CR and 13-18-00017-

CR was due on January 16, 2018, and requested that she file a response as to the status of the record within ten days. The reporter was advised that if a response was not filed,

the matter would be referred to the Court for appropriate action. To date, the reporter

has failed to respond to this Court’s notice and a reporter’s record has not been filed.

The reporter requested an extension of time to file the record in 13-18-00018-CR. An

extension of time was granted until March 15, 2018, however, the reporter’s record has

not been filed.

This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further

delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). Accordingly,

this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court.

Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given

and conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant has abandoned his appeals. If it

is determined that appellant has not abandoned his appeals, the court shall further

determine if appellant’s attorney of record continues to represent appellant and will

diligently pursue this appeal.

The court shall further determine if the reporter’s record, or any part thereof, has

been lost or destroyed, and shall make appropriate findings under Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f),

if necessary. Otherwise, the court shall determine what steps are necessary to ensure

the prompt preparation of a reporter's record, and shall enter any orders required to avoid

further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights.

The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and orders and cause them to be

included in a supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this

Court within thirty days from the date of this order.

2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this the 21st day of March, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Samuel Leal v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-leal-v-state-texapp-2018.