Samuel Jurado v. State
This text of Samuel Jurado v. State (Samuel Jurado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant's brief was due February 14, 2008. The brief has not been received and no extension of time has been requested. Appellant's appointed attorney, Bobby Dale Barina, did not respond to the Court's notice that the brief is overdue.
The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether the attorney it appointed to represent appellant has abandoned the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter's notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than April 30, 2008. Rule 38.8(b)(3).
__________________________________________
Diane Henson, Justice
Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson
Abated
Filed: March 27, 2008
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Samuel Jurado v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-jurado-v-state-texapp-2008.