Samuel Jerome v. Michael Crum

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 4, 2019
Docket159093
StatusPublished

This text of Samuel Jerome v. Michael Crum (Samuel Jerome v. Michael Crum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel Jerome v. Michael Crum, (Mich. 2019).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 4, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

159093 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra SAMUEL JEROME, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159093 COA: 335328 Oakland CC: 2015-148401-CZ MICHAEL CRUM and CITY OF BERKLEY, Defendants-Appellees.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the circuit court erroneously granted summary disposition to the defendants on the ground of collateral estoppel. In addition to the briefs, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellees shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellees shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellees’ brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 4, 2019 t1001 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Samuel Jerome v. Michael Crum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-jerome-v-michael-crum-mich-2019.