Samuel James v. United States
317 F.2d 170
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of housebreaking, larceny and the destruction of movable property. D.C.Code §§ 22-1801, 22-2201, 22-403 (1961). He appeals from a sentence of imprisonment. After reviewing the contentions made, we find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Samuel James v. United States, 317 F.2d 170 (D.C. Cir. 1963).
317 F.2d 170 (Samuel James v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James v. Director of Motor Vehicles
193 A.2d 209 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1963)