Samuel J. Miller & Co. v. A. Schreter & Sons Co.

374 F.2d 510, 153 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 90
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1967
DocketNo. 10649
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 374 F.2d 510 (Samuel J. Miller & Co. v. A. Schreter & Sons Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel J. Miller & Co. v. A. Schreter & Sons Co., 374 F.2d 510, 153 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 90 (4th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Patent No. 2,813,273, issued to Abraham Schreter on November 19, 1957, for a button-down necktie was declared invalid by the District Court at the suit of Samuel J. Miller & Co., a manufacturer of them. The decision went upon the finding that the invention claimed in the letters patent was described in printed publications and was in public use, and on sale in the United States by the defendant-appellant A. Schreter & Sons Company, Incorporated, and others, more than a year before the application for the patent. 35 U.S.C. 102(b). The present holders or owners of the patent are also defendants and appellants.

We affirm the declaration of the District Court upon the basis of its accompanying opinion, Samuel J. Miller & Co. v. A. Schreter & Sons Co., 246 F. Supp. 737 (D.Md.1965).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spalding, Division of Questor Corp. v. Antonious
68 F.R.D. 222 (D. Maryland, 1975)
Samuel J. Miller & Co. v. Schreter & Sons Company
374 F.2d 510 (Fourth Circuit, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 F.2d 510, 153 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-j-miller-co-v-a-schreter-sons-co-ca4-1967.