Samuel Hernandez v. Railroad Retirement Board
This text of 378 F. App'x 594 (Samuel Hernandez v. Railroad Retirement Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Samuel Hernandez petitions for review of the final decision of the Railroad Retire *595 ment Board (Board) adopting the decision of the hearings officer that Hernandez’s February 2008 annuity adjustment was properly calculated. Hernandez has not pointed to any error in the Board’s adjustment calculation, and we find none. See Worms v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 255 F.3d 502, 505 (8th Cir.2001) (Board’s decision will be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence, is not arbitrary, and has reasonable basis in law). Hernandez’s arguments concerning earlier decisions and other issues are beyond the scope of our review. See 45 U.S.C. § 355(f) (claimant may seek review of final decision of Board after exhausting all administrative remedies within Board). Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 F. App'x 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-hernandez-v-railroad-retirement-board-ca8-2010.