Samuel Haley v. United States Government

674 F. App'x 616

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: February 8, 2017
• Docket: 16-3856
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Samuel E. Haley appeals after the district court denied him leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his civil rights action, based on 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (three-strikes rule), and dismissed his complaint. Mr. Haley is not subject to the restrictions of section 1915(g), because his filings in the district court and in this court reflect that he was released from incarceration in August 2014, he was living in a transitional housing facility, and he was not a prisoner at the time he filed his complaint and his notice of appeal to this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h) (as used in this section, “prisoner” means—as relevant—any person incarcerated in any facility, who is convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or terms or conditions of parole, probation, or pretrial release); Owens v. Isaac, 487 F.3d 561, 563 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (reviewing de novo district court’s interpretation and application of § 1915(g)).

We therefore grant Mr. Haley’s motion to proceed IFP in this court, we vacate the district court’s denial of IFP and dismissal of Mr. Haley’s complaint, and we remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We deny the pending motion for appointment of counsel.