Samuel Ford v. State
This text of Samuel Ford v. State (Samuel Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 3, 1999
AFFIRMED AS REFORMED
Pursuant to a plea bargain, Samuel Ford pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced to one year confinement, probated for two years. Later, the State moved to revoke Ford's probation, and the trial court granted the motion. On appeal, Ford contends the trial court erroneously denied him forty-three days of jail time credit.
The State concedes Ford is entitled to jail time credit. See Ex parte Bates, 978 S.W.2d 575, 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). However, the State argues Ford is entitled to only thirty-day days, rather than the forty-three days claimed by Ford. We agree the State properly calculated the days between the date of Ford's arrest, August 20, 1998, and the date his probation was revoked, September 21, 1998. We therefore reform the trial court's judgment to reflect a jail sentence of one year with a credit of thirty-days for time served. As reformed, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Return to
Fourth Court of Appeals
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Samuel Ford v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-ford-v-state-texapp-1999.