Samuel Eichlin v. Holland Tramway Co.

52 A. 210, 68 N.J.L. 78, 39 Vroom 78, 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 88
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 9, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 52 A. 210 (Samuel Eichlin v. Holland Tramway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel Eichlin v. Holland Tramway Co., 52 A. 210, 68 N.J.L. 78, 39 Vroom 78, 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 88 (N.J. 1902).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The demurrer filed to the declaration cannot be sustained. That pleading is, it is true, redundant to the point of embarrassing the issue, but inasmuch as it sets out a cause of action it is good upon general demurrer. The gist of the' action shown is that the defendants maintained ^in the highway things that were at once a public nuisance, and the actual cause of private injury of a physical nature to the plaintiffs.

This answers all of the causes assigned for demurrer that have any substance.

Judgment upon demurrer is given for the plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A. 210, 68 N.J.L. 78, 39 Vroom 78, 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-eichlin-v-holland-tramway-co-nj-1902.