Samuel E. Jenkins v. Edward W. Murray

Fourth Circuit

Samuel E. Jenkins v. Edward W. Murray

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24876, 1995 WL 404942

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 1995

Docket94-7410

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 822 (Samuel E. Jenkins v. Edward W. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samuel E. Jenkins v. Edward W. Murray, 60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24876, 1995 WL 404942 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Samuel E. JENKINS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-7410.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 10, 1995.

Samuel E. Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jenkins v. Murray, No. CA-94-327-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Samuel E. JENKINS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-7410.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 10, 1995.

Samuel E. Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jenkins v. Murray, No. CA-94-327-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24876, 1995 WL 404942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-e-jenkins-v-edward-w-murray-ca4-1995.