Samuel Darrington v. State of Alabama
This text of Samuel Darrington v. State of Alabama (Samuel Darrington v. State of Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rel: December 19, 2025
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter.
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals OCTOBER TERM, 2025-2026 _________________________
CR-2024-0033 _________________________
Samuel Darrington
v.
State of Alabama
Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court (CC-21-652)
COLE, Judge.
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Minor and Anderson, JJ., concur. Windom, P.J., concurs in part and
dissents in part, with opinion, which Kellum, J., joins. CR-2024-0033
WINDOM, Presiding Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur to affirm Samuel Darrington's convictions for murder, see
§ 13A-6-2(a)(1), Ala. Code 1975, and shooting into an unoccupied vehicle,
see § 13A-11-61(a), Ala. Code 1975, as well as his sentence of 25 years in
prison for his murder conviction. However, as to his straight two-year
sentence for his shooting-into-an-unoccupied-vehicle conviction, I would
remand this case for the imposition of a split sentence in compliance with
the versions of §§ 13A-5-6 and 15-18-8, Ala. Code 1975, in effect at the
time of Darrington's offenses.1
Shooting into an unoccupied vehicle is a Class C felony. § 13A-6-
61(c), Ala. Code 1975. At the time of Darrington's offenses, the range of
imprisonment for a Class C felony was "not more than 10 years or less
than 1 year and 1 day and must be in accordance with subsection (b) of
Section 15-18-8 unless sentencing is pursuant to Section 13A-5-9 or the
offense is a sex offense pursuant to Section 15-20A-5." Former § 13A-5-
1Both § 13A-5-6 and § 15-18-8 were amended effective July 1, 2023.
See Ala. Acts 2023, Act No. 2023-461. 2 CR-2024-0033
6(a)(3) (emphasis added). 2 Former § 15-18-8(b) 1975, stated, in relevant
part:
"[W]hen a defendant is convicted of an offense that constitutes a Class C … felony offense and receives a sentence of not more than 15 years, the judge presiding over the case shall order that the convicted defendant be confined in a prison … for a Class C felony offense … for a period not exceeding two years in cases where the imposed sentence is not more than 15 years, and that the execution of the remainder of the sentence be suspended notwithstanding any provision of the law to the contrary and that the defendant be placed on probation for a period not exceeding three years and upon such terms as the court deems best."
(Emphasis added.)
In its unpublished memorandum, the majority implicitly holds that
a straight sentence "for a period not exceeding two years" does not need
to be split. Former § 15-18-8(b). Former § 15-18-8(b), though,
contemplated a term of confinement separate and apart from the imposed
sentence. Further, a split sentence is necessary to give effect to the
prohibition of "good time" for those sentenced pursuant to the former §
15-18-8. See Ferris v. State, 648 So. 2d 657, 658 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994)
(holding that a defendant sentenced under the Split Sentence Act is not
2Darrington was neither sentenced pursuant to § 13A-5-9, Ala. Code 1975, nor convicted of a sex offense pursuant to § 15-20A-5, Ala. Code 1975. 3 CR-2024-0033
entitled to incentive time credit while serving the minimum period of
confinement). At the time of Darrington's offenses, former § 15-18-8(k)
stated that "[n]o defendant serving a minimum period of confinement
ordered under subsection (a) or (b) shall be entitled to parole or to
deductions from his or her sentence under the Alabama Correctional
Incentive Time Act, during the minimum period of confinement so
ordered." Yet, a straight sentence, like the one imposed on Darrington,
would, assuming he is otherwise eligible, accrue deductions under the
Alabama Correctional Incentive Time Act. See § 14-9-41, Ala. Code 1975.
I do not believe that a straight sentence for a Class C felony, even
if it does not exceed two years in prison, complies with the versions of §
13A-5-6 and § 15-18-8 in effect at the time of Darrington's offenses.
Therefore, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the unpublished
memorandum that affirms his sentence for shooting into an unoccupied
vehicle.
Kellum, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Samuel Darrington v. State of Alabama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-darrington-v-state-of-alabama-alacrimapp-2025.