Samuel D. Collins v. Clinton T. Duffy, Warden at San Quentin Prison, California

178 F.2d 923
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 1950
Docket12325
StatusPublished

This text of 178 F.2d 923 (Samuel D. Collins v. Clinton T. Duffy, Warden at San Quentin Prison, California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel D. Collins v. Clinton T. Duffy, Warden at San Quentin Prison, California, 178 F.2d 923 (9th Cir. 1950).

Opinion

178 F.2d 923

Samuel D. COLLINS, Appellant,
v.
Clinton T. DUFFY, Warden at San Quentin Prison, California, Appellee.

No. 12325.

United States Court of Appeals
Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 17, 1950.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 23, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Louis Goodman, Judge.

Bryan R. McCarthy, San Rafael, Cal., Samuel D. Collins, in pro. per., for appellant.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Deputy pattorney General, for appellee.

Before HEALY, McALLISTER, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of Wolf v. People of State of Colorado, 338 U.S. 25, 69 S.Ct. 1359.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolf v. Colorado
338 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 F.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-d-collins-v-clinton-t-duffy-warden-at-san-q-ca9-1950.