Samuel Cummins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

217 F.2d 303
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 26, 1954
Docket22770_1
StatusPublished

This text of 217 F.2d 303 (Samuel Cummins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel Cummins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 217 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1954).

Opinion

217 F.2d 303

54-2 USTC P 9698

Samuel CUMMINS, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 81, Docket 22770.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 10, 1954.
Decided Nov. 26, 1954.

Henry Pearlman, New York City, for petitioner.

Morton K. Rothschild, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ellis N. Slack and Robert N. Anderson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and HARLAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the decision of Judge Raum, 19 T.C. 246.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cummins v. Commissioner
19 T.C. 246 (U.S. Tax Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 F.2d 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-cummins-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca2-1954.