Samuel Cummins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Second Circuit

Samuel Cummins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

217 F.2d 303

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 26, 1954·No. 22770_1·Published

Opinion

217 F.2d 303

54-2 USTC P 9698

Samuel CUMMINS, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 81, Docket 22770.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 10, 1954.
Decided Nov. 26, 1954.

Henry Pearlman, New York City, for petitioner.

Morton K. Rothschild, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ellis N. Slack and Robert N. Anderson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and HARLAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the decision of Judge Raum, 19 T.C. 246.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

217 F.2d 303

54-2 USTC P 9698

Samuel CUMMINS, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 81, Docket 22770.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 10, 1954.
Decided Nov. 26, 1954.

Henry Pearlman, New York City, for petitioner.

Morton K. Rothschild, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ellis N. Slack and Robert N. Anderson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and HARLAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the decision of Judge Raum, 19 T.C. 246.

Samuel Cummins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 217 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1954).

Pincite

217 F.2d 303 (Samuel Cummins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related