Samuel Cresswell and Janet Cresswell, His Wife v. Axel Axelrod

Third Circuit

Samuel Cresswell and Janet Cresswell, His Wife v. Axel Axelrod

222 F.2d 367, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3822

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 31, 1955

Docket11560_1

StatusPublished

This text of 222 F.2d 367 (Samuel Cresswell and Janet Cresswell, His Wife v. Axel Axelrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samuel Cresswell and Janet Cresswell, His Wife v. Axel Axelrod, 222 F.2d 367, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3822 (3d Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

*368 PER CURIAM.

In this automobile personal injuries case, counsel for appellant argued carefully and capably that the judgment is contrary to the weight of the evidence and to the Pennsylvania incontrovertible physical facts rule. We think that under the evidence these matters were for the jury and the trial court. With reference to the form of the verdict, the error, if any, was- unsubstantial.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*368 PER CURIAM.

In this automobile personal injuries case, counsel for appellant argued carefully and capably that the judgment is contrary to the weight of the evidence and to the Pennsylvania incontrovertible physical facts rule. We think that under the evidence these matters were for the jury and the trial court. With reference to the form of the verdict, the error, if any, was- unsubstantial.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 F.2d 367, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-cresswell-and-janet-cresswell-his-wife-v-axel-axelrod-ca3-1955.