Samuel Crego v. Guillermo Lash & John Hoysick
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00588-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
MARIA DE LA LUZ CARRILLO, Appellant, v.
ELEAZAR CARRILLO, Appellee.
On Appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Maria De La Luz Carrillo, appealed a judgment rendered in the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas in cause number F-3223-07-G. Appellant has now filed a motion to withdraw her notice of appeal in which she asserts that she no longer desires to pursue the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to withdraw her notice of appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s motion is granted and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of May, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Samuel Crego v. Guillermo Lash & John Hoysick (Samuel Crego v. Guillermo Lash & John Hoysick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.