Samuel Collette Jr. v. State
This text of Samuel Collette Jr. v. State (Samuel Collette Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00307-CR ____________________
SAMUEL COLLETTE JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 302496 ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury found Samuel Collette Jr. (Collette) guilty of driving while
intoxicated with an open container of alcohol. See Tex. Penal Code Ann.
§ 49.04(a), (c) (West Supp. 2015). The trial court sentenced Collette to 180 days in
jail, with credit for time served. Collette timely filed a notice of appeal.
Collette’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional
evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.
1 1978). We granted an extension of time for Collette to file a pro se brief. Collette
did not respond or file a pro se brief.
We have independently examined the entire appellate record in this matter,
and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal. We have determined that
this appeal is wholly frivolous. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order
appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813
S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1
AFFIRMED.
_________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice
Submitted on April 7, 2016 Opinion Delivered April 13, 2016 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
1 Collette may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Samuel Collette Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-collette-jr-v-state-texapp-2016.