Samuel Cole Foster v. The State of Wyoming

2020 WY 107, 469 P.3d 401
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 19, 2020
DocketS-20-0091
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 WY 107 (Samuel Cole Foster v. The State of Wyoming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel Cole Foster v. The State of Wyoming, 2020 WY 107, 469 P.3d 401 (Wyo. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2020 WY 107

April Term, A.D. 2020

August 19, 2020

SAMUEL COLE FOSTER,

Appellant (Defendant),

v. S-20-0091

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee (Plaintiff).

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE [¶ 1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional “no contest” plea to one count of sexual abuse of a minor in the third degree. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-316(a)(i). The district court imposed a five to seven-year sentence, which was suspended in favor of a split sentence of one year in jail followed by three years of supervised probation. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s January 15, 2020, “Order After Change of Plea Hearing Judgment and Sentence.”

[¶ 2] On June 15, 2020, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently ordered that Appellant may “file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider in this appeal.” This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision” on this appeal. Appellant’s pro se brief was due for filing on or before July 30, 2020. Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted. [¶ 3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief” submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s judgment and sentence should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

[¶ 4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Samuel Cole Foster, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further

[¶ 5] ORDERED that the Johnson County District Court’s January 15, 2020, “Order After Change of Plea Hearing Judgment and Sentence” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶ 6] DATED this 19th day of August, 2020.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

MICHAEL K. DAVIS Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 WY 107, 469 P.3d 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-cole-foster-v-the-state-of-wyoming-wyo-2020.