Samuel C. Golden v. Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr.
This text of Samuel C. Golden v. Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr. (Samuel C. Golden v. Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D16-4960 _____________________________
SAMUEL C. GOLDEN,
Appellant,
v.
ESTATE OF HANS G. TANZLER, JR.,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Peter L. Dearing, Judge.
December 10, 2018
PER CURIAM.
In Burdoo v. Plympton, this court held that “[a] court reversibly errs when a prisoner requests to appear telephonically[] and the court fails to issue an order directed to the Department of Corrections requiring the prisoner to appear telephonically.” 219 So. 3d 170, 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017); accord Havenner v. Hutchinson, 162 So. 3d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). In this case, that is what happened.
REVERSED.
ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Samuel C. Golden, pro se, Appellant.
Hans G. Tanzler, III, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr., pro se, Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Samuel C. Golden v. Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-c-golden-v-estate-of-hans-g-tanzler-jr-fladistctapp-2018.