Samuel C. Golden v. Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D16-4960
SAMUEL C. GOLDEN,
Appellant,
v.
ESTATE OF HANS G. TANZLER, JR.,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Peter L. Dearing, Judge.
December 10, 2018
PER CURIAM.
In Burdoo v. Plympton, this court held that “[a] court reversibly errs when a prisoner requests to appear telephonically[] and the court fails to issue an order directed to the Department of Corrections requiring the prisoner to appear telephonically.” 219 So. 3d 170, 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017); accord Havenner v. Hutchinson, 162 So. 3d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). In this case, that is what happened.
REVERSED.
ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Samuel C. Golden, pro se, Appellant.
Hans G. Tanzler, III, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr., pro se, Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Samuel C. Golden v. Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr. (Samuel C. Golden v. Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.