Samuel Bryce Silk, Jr. v. United States

712 F. App'x 586
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2018
Docket16-4428
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 712 F. App'x 586 (Samuel Bryce Silk, Jr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel Bryce Silk, Jr. v. United States, 712 F. App'x 586 (8th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Bryce Silk, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 after it sua sponte enforced a collateral review waiver in his plea agreement. Silk’s motion raises one claim: that he could not, as a matter of law, have committed the crime to which he pleaded guilty, domestic assault as a habitual offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 117.

Upon de novo review, we conclude that the collateral review waiver is unenforceable because, during the plea hearing, the district court neither informed Silk of the terms of the waiver, nor determined that he understood its terms. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1)(N); United States v. Boneshirt, 662 F.3d 509, 516 (8th Cir. 2011). We therefore vacate the denial of Silk’s § 2255 motion, and remand the case to the district court for further consideration. We leave for the district court to determine,in the first instance: (1) whether any other procedural hurdles preclude consideration of Silk’s claim on the merits; and (2) if not, whether Silk had at least two prior qualifying convictions that were “final” on July 12, 2014, when the events underlying this case occurred. See 18 U.S.C. § 117(a)(1) (requiring, as relevant, that a defendant’s prior convictions be both “final” and “against a spouse or intimate partner”); see also United States v. Wroblewski, 816 F.3d 1021, 1024-25 (8th Cir. 2016); United States v. Frook, 616 F.3d 773, 774-76 (8th Cir. 2010). Finally, we note that Silk attacks the validity of his conviction, and his currently scheduled release date is May 11, 2018. We are confident the district court will act expeditiously.

Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Samuel Silk, Jr. v. United States
955 F.3d 681 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 F. App'x 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-bryce-silk-jr-v-united-states-ca8-2018.