Samuel Breiter & Co. v. Ward La France Truck Corp.

19 Misc. 2d 958, 189 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3449
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 18, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An entry in the records of a defendant showing the amount of a trade-in allowance in a transaction is not admissible, under section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act, as against third persons, to establish the reasonable value of the article traded in.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Breiter & Co. v. Ward La France Truck Corp., 19 Misc. 2d 958, 189 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

19 Misc. 2d 958 (Samuel Breiter & Co. v. Ward La France Truck Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Goettsche
48 Misc. 2d 786 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)