Samuel Boyd, Jr. v. Doctor Fox Doctor Casrey Dr. Ramsey Doctor Marshall Steven Hanna, Doctor, and Larry Huffman Sergeant Kennedy Sergeant Conner

34 F.3d 1066, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31763, 1994 WL 401720

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 4, 1994
• Docket: 94-6253
• Status: Published

Opinion

34 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Samuel BOYD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Doctor FOX; Doctor Casrey; Dr. Ramsey; Doctor Marshall;
Steven Hanna, Doctor, Defendants Appellees,
and
Larry Huffman; Sergeant Kennedy; Sergeant Conner, Defendants.

No. 94-6253.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994
Decided Aug. 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-7-R)

Samuel Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Sandra Morris Holleran, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, V.; Gary Elton Tegenkamp, Wooten & Hart, P.C.; Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Mary Christine Maggard, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Fox, No. CA-93-7-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED